PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Memory | 96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Z800 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AECh |
Memory | 89.1 GB free of 96.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160224 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 08 '21 at 15:09 |
Run Duration | 188 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
|
72.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
Gigabyte(1458 254D) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.11.1
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
35.7%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WDC WDS 500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4110
|
||||
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
212GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 616 589 480 312 312 312 MB/s
|
125%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$48
331GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 110 107 110 110 MB/s
|
63.4%
Good
|
|||
Hua72202 0ALA330 59Y 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: JKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 96 101 98 101 100 MB/s
|
57.8%
Above average
|
|||
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
190GB free
Firmware: MK7O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 105 104 106 104 MB/s
|
58.7%
Above average
|
|||
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
835GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 34 33 34 34 MB/s
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 321x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 189x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples | 180x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 163x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 90x |
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples | 68x |
SSD | |
---|---|
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples | 38x |
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples | 34x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 34x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |