Today's hottest deals

HP 650 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP 650 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1858
Memory3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '21 at 21:18
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium B970
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 85.4
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 120
56% 88.6 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 120
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 1858) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3372
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
1.04% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.1
1% 1.2 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 1.3
2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.04%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Esa3smf2 HTGT120GB 120GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 131 128 132 138 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 446
Write 136
Mixed 156
SusWrite 130
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 9.2
53% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 57.1
63% 106 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CK0 M471B5773DH0-CK0 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 650 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 650 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback