Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Razer Blade Stealth 13 Late 2019 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer LY320
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201006
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 09 '21 at 19:45
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1065G7 58,314 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Memory 68.7 1-Core 135 2-Core 252 82% 152 Pts	4-Core 466 8-Core 659 71% 563 Pts	64-Core 655 40% 655 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7 52,498 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Device(1A58 1001) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9126 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Lighting 16.6 Reflection 16.1 Parallax 17.8 14% 16.8 fps	MRender 18.6 Gravity 17.9 Splatting 0.3 9% 12.3 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL HBRPEKNX0203A 1TB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 181% 874GB free (System drive) Firmware: G002 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1027 1167 1127 1128 1134 1145 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	240% Outstanding	Read 1,313 Write 1,162 Mixed 909 SusWrite 1,121 253% 1,126 MB/s	4K Read 56.7 4K Write 173 4K Mixed 79.4 279% 103 MB/s	DQ Read 624 DQ Write 830 DQ Mixed 467 425% 640 MB/s
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 240% Great: 240%
Generic External 250GB 627 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 94GB free, PID 0840 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 34.4 Write 30.4 Mixed 26.2 SusWrite 39.6 44% 32.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 2x8GB 7,828 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3733 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	MC Read 46.7 MC Write 46.4 MC Mixed 40.7 127% 44.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 37.9 SC Mixed 27.8 80% 27.9 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 119%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

CPU
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	264x

GPU
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	142x
GTX 1650 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 36%, 6,904 samples	90x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	5x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	67x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	53x
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	33x

RAM
K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 2x8GBSamsungBench 104%, 7,828 samples	256x
2x8GBMicronBench 83%, 3,676 samples	8x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16