QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '21 at 05:57
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	41%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core (Haswell, no TSX, IBRS) 116 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Memory 59.7 1-Core 99.7 2-Core 160 61% 106 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 336 35% 282 Pts	64-Core 290 18% 290 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 419GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 39GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 72 72 71 71 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	11.5% Very poor	Read 158 Write 152 Mixed 81 SusWrite 71.1 26% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 3% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 72%
Red Hat VirtIO 215GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 542 90 92 164 137 144 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 93%
Red Hat VirtIO 581GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 346GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 72 72 72 71 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	70.6% Very good	Read 175 Write 143 Mixed 82.5 SusWrite 71.2 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 103%
Red Hat VirtIO 537GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 334GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 36 31 32 31 32 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 108 Write 87.5 Mixed 72 SusWrite 33.9 56% 75.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 103%
Red Hat VirtIO 463GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 305GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 37 38 35 37 43 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.7% Below average	Read 93 Write 74.4 Mixed 65.1 SusWrite 38 50% 67.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x16GB 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 17 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 13.3 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 161%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	140x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	73x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16