HP 250 G5 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.54% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP 250 G5 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81EB
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160519
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 14 '21 at 11:16
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 166
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 254
34% 254 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 81EB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6518
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
5.54% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 6.9
5% 5.93 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 10.1
7% 8.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.54%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY256HDHP-000H1 256GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT21H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 168 139 141 140 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 442
Write 398
Mixed 286
SusWrite 162
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 41.2
142% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 327
252% 344 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.2% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 21.9
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 20.6
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 250 G5 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,070 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 250 G5 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback