To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '21 at 13:54
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 71
1-Core 55.5
2-Core 145
53% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 662
57% 488 Pts
64-Core 1,635
101% 1,635 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Gigabyte(1458 37C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 172
Parallax 170
139% 171 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 149
Splatting 124
121% 152 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 134%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asgard AN2 2TNVMe-M.2/80 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A4SANA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1407 1266 1244 1085 1198 1222 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1712
Write 1,204
Mixed 129
SusWrite 1,237
238% 1,070 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 40.6
133% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 434
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 347
258% 347 MB/s
Poor: 201%
This bench: 201%
Great: 366%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70QB0- 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 51.1
MC Write 42.1
MC Mixed 40.1
127% 44.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.4
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 106%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback