Asus Q87M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Q87M-E (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190322
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '21 at 18:02
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570S 11,172 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 82 1-Core 102 2-Core 166 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 353 8-Core 368 48% 360 Pts	64-Core 363 22% 363 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB CLim: 947 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.5% Average	Lighting 62.4 Reflection 67.8 Parallax 78.8 51% 69.7 fps	MRender 58.3 Gravity 54.5 Splatting 41.1 41% 51.3 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Rambaite C500 256GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0703A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 39 52 75 57 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Read 485 Write 396 Mixed 112 SusWrite 53.9 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 61.2 4K Mixed 1.9 73% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 159 DQ Write 78.2 DQ Mixed 1 32% 79.5 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$112 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 143 144 144 144 145 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	97.2% Outstanding	Read 195 Write 162 Mixed 71.6 SusWrite 144 104% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 105%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 135 137 137 136 138 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-006.A01LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 9905471-006.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 16GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.4% Above average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 16.3 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 16.3 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 77 52% 77 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q87M-E Builds (Compare 1,221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus Q87M-E

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	230x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	186x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	110x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	136x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	104x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	82x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $44Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	45x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples	49x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	14x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $379

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16