Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	70.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8850H 20,669 User benchmarks, average bench 71% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.3% Outstanding	Memory 91 1-Core 134 2-Core 232 87% 152 Pts	4-Core 513 8-Core 850 83% 681 Pts	64-Core 1,051 65% 1,051 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4200 536 User benchmarks, average bench 71% HP(103C 842F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.42 Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70.9% Very good	Lighting 86.9 Reflection 98.7 Parallax 89.5 71% 91.7 fps	MRender 79.9 Gravity 87.1 Splatting 91.3 71% 86.1 fps
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 80%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GB 20,750 User benchmarks, average bench 209% 294GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA73H1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,271 Write 1,492 Mixed 753 330% 1,505 MB/s	4K Read 49.6 4K Write 92.3 4K Mixed 63.2 205% 68.4 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 802 DQ Mixed 626 449% 556 MB/s
Poor: 123% Great: 295%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 4x8GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (95^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	81% Excellent	MC Read 29.3 MC Write 31.2 MC Mixed 25 81% 28.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 32.9 SC Mixed 25.6 73% 25.7 GB/s	Latency 65.7 61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 81%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	259x
Quadro P3200NvidiaBench 55%, 1,890 samples	128x
Quadro P5200NvidiaBench 80%, 527 samples	119x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	120x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	81x
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H7 512GBSamsungBench 216%, 1,262 samples	48x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	79x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	40x
HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 2x16GBHynixBench 82%, 1,927 samples	28x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16