Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190307
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 21 '21 at 10:30
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-6300 APU-$51
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Memory 54.4
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 91.6
43% 70.5 Pts
4-Core 101
8-Core 81.5
13% 91.3 Pts
64-Core 93
6% 93 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 2847) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.6% Poor
Lighting 28.5
Reflection 32
Parallax 38.3
23% 32.9 fps
MRender 41.1
Gravity 39.9
Splatting 31.7
30% 37.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$25
647GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 125 134 143 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
80% Excellent
Read 142
Write 173
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 137
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.4
109% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80%
Great: 107%
Generic- SD/MMC 4GB
4GB free, PID 0119
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 14 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
9.68% Terrible
Read 19.2
Write 14.5
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 14.5
17% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.8
107% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 9.68%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
21.8% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 7.9
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 8.2
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A78M-HD2 Builds (Compare 249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback