Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9300-$70 3,287 User benchmarks, average bench 38% U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	42.4% Average	Memory 73.4 1-Core 37.4 2-Core 71 41% 60.6 Pts	4-Core 70.2 8-Core 69.4 9% 69.8 Pts	64-Core 70.1 4% 70.1 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 42%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST9120823AS 120GB-$160 304 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AHE SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 39 40 39 40 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	23% Poor	Read 40.8 Write 41.2 Mixed 32 SusWrite 39 28% 38.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	14.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 3.9 13% 4.43 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.37 GB/s	Latency 93.7 43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo T7500Intel $90Bench 35%, 4,281 samples	7x
Core2 Duo T7700Intel $100Bench 37%, 1,898 samples	4x
Core2 Duo T8300Intel $27Bench 37%, 2,604 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro FX 1600MNvidiaBench 2%, 423 samples	13x
Quadro FX 3600MNvidiaBench 3%, 114 samples	1x

SSD
335 Series 240GBIntel $219Bench 77%, 4,220 samples	1x
INTENSO 256GBBench 72%, 4,055 samples	1x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $309