Intel S2600CP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardIntel S2600CP  (all builds)
Memory30.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130822
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 24 '21 at 20:00
Run Duration1484 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 74.2
2-Core 148
59% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 439
45% 362 Pts
64-Core 1,049
65% 1,049 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI MR9260-16i 161GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1266 1266 1268 1266 1252 1142 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
LSI MR9260-16i 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1298 1293 1293 1294 1294 1294 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
LSI MR9260-16i 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1264 1268 1268 1269 1268 1269 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
LSI MR9260-16i 457GB
413GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1055 1048 1048 1049 1048 1047 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965516-165.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.7% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.2
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S2600CP Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Intel S2600CP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback