Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4125 2,594 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Memory 32.9 1-Core 55.9 2-Core 110 36% 66.4 Pts	4-Core 191 8-Core 174 25% 182 Pts	64-Core 187 12% 187 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0301 02F3) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6708 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.2% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 3.2 Parallax 2.4 2% 2.6 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4.3 3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.2% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac S539N4/128GPN 128GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: T1125A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 299 300 301 304 303 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 352 Write 292 Mixed 297 SusWrite 299 70% 310 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 69.4 4K Mixed 12 87% 34.9 MB/s	DQ Read 66.9 DQ Write 294 DQ Mixed 26.9 65% 129 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 65%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 2GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.9 7 7 7 7 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	10% Very poor	Read 18.2 Write 6.2 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 6.9 11% 9.75 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 2 139% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 11.8 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 238 17% 238 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	48x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	48x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	48x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16