Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro14,3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacBookPro14,3  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-551B86E5744E2388
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200616
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '21 at 16:31
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 181
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 395
45% 351 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 560
Apple(106B 0179) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 907 MHz, MLim: 1270 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 29.3
19% 17.6 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 15
Splatting 13.4
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM1024L 1TB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXS5EA0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1334 1231 1263 1269 1262 1345 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1,703
Write 1,548
Mixed 900
SusWrite 1,284
305% 1,359 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 34.3
116% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 947
DQ Write 597
DQ Mixed 769
574% 771 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 217%
Great: 244%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4D5435324C31473332443450472D30393320 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.9% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 22.1
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 19.8
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro14,3 Builds (Compare 189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Apple MacBookPro14,3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback