Today's hottest deals

Medion E6246 MD63200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion E6246 MD63200  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION M15GUN
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181012
Uptime7.4 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '21 at 17:21
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 48.1
1-Core 57.9
2-Core 113
42% 73 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 225
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
Device(1E39 A007) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
2.63% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 3.7
2% 2.77 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.63%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S11-256G-PHISON-SSD-B3 256GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 82 68 75 62 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 424
Write 363
Mixed 315
SusWrite 88
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 5
61% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 35.2
DQ Mixed 19.7
47% 105 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.5% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 9.2
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E6246 MD63200 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E6246 MD63200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback