AZW GT-R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAZW GT-R  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW GT-R
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '21 at 17:45
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 70.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
75% 137 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 561
61% 481 Pts
64-Core 553
34% 553 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Lighting 15.4
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 21.1
13% 16.9 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 16.4
Splatting 13.6
11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0928A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 791 803 808 821 793 809 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,593
Write 802
Mixed 791
SusWrite 804
222% 998 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 24
174% 73.8 MB/s
DQ Read 595
DQ Write 780
DQ Mixed 379
372% 585 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 193%
Great: 166%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
197GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 88 128 93 81 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 364
Write 338
Mixed 322
SusWrite 141
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 84.1
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 31
DQ Mixed 49.8
53% 92.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 92%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
6GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 15 14 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
6.95% Terrible
Read 20.3
Write 13.5
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 14.5
18% 14 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.95%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 4ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 CT8G4SFS824A.C8FP 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69.4% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 21.8
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 23.2
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GT-R Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: AZW GT-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback