Asrock A320M/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M/ac  (all builds)
Memory0.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '21 at 23:02
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 58.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 227
74% 137 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 827
76% 634 Pts
64-Core 791
49% 791 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
ASRock(1849 5119) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.9% Above average
Lighting 68.1
Reflection 61.6
Parallax 115
56% 81.7 fps
MRender 51.7
Gravity 70.5
Splatting 37.3
42% 53.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Neo Forza NFS011SA324-6007000 240GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1031B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 29 27 35 37 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 381
Write 67.5
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 32.2
27% 126 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 33.6
4K Mixed 12.6
51% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 97
DQ Write 46.5
DQ Mixed 11.3
24% 51.6 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
39.5% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 13.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 11.3
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M/ac Builds (Compare 1,751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock A320M/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback