HP xw9400 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP xw9400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A1Ch
Memory24.8 GB free of 28.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091210
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '21 at 08:54
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Six-Core AMD Opteron 8435
CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Memory 47.5
1-Core 36.2
2-Core 77
33% 53.6 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 306
27% 229 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
Sapphire(174B 353E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.2.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.8% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 57.4
Parallax 75.9
49% 64.4 fps
MRender 58.8
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 41.9
43% 53.5 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nfs061sa 312-6007200 120GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q072
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 161 150 114 65 78 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.2% Good
Read 232
Write 202
Mixed 208
SusWrite 127
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 42
140% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 54.2
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 64.8
53% 73.3 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 69%
AM10 0GB
0GB free, PID 1169
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8.8
Write 3.5
Mixed 5.5
7% 5.93 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
13% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 61GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
24.3% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw9400 Workstation Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP xw9400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback