Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire A315-54K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-54K  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Sleepy_KL
Memory7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '21 at 02:32
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 69.7
2-Core 110
54% 85.4 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 260
34% 254 Pts
64-Core 262
16% 262 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Acer(1025 1355) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.85% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 3
Parallax 6.2
4% 4.87 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 9.2
6% 6.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.85%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
INNOVATION¡¤IT 512GB
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 408 139 192 148 207 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 901
Write 762
Mixed 666
SusWrite 243
144% 643 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 23.2
86% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 843
DQ Write 694
DQ Mixed 557
475% 698 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 111%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 075D GR2400S464L17S/8G 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.7% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 12.9
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.7
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-54K Builds (Compare 361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-54K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback