Today's hottest deals

Google Compute Engine

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory60GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 60GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGoogle Compute Engine  (all builds)
MotherboardGoogle Google Compute Engine
Memory56.5 GB free of 60 GB
Display2451 x 1233 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '21 at 20:12
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 66.3
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 193
66% 119 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 738
66% 557 Pts
64-Core 999
62% 999 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Tesla P4
Nvidia(10DE 11D8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1501 MHz, Ram: 7.5GB, Driver: 431.79
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.8% Above average
Lighting 75
Reflection 77.1
Parallax 73.5
61% 75.2 fps
MRender 58
Gravity 80.6
Splatting 70.3
57% 69.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Google PersistentDisk 537GB
471GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 5.3 120 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 121
Write 79.5
Mixed 129
SusWrite 40.8
70% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 5.4
905% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 60GB
null MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 12288 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 49.6
MC Mixed 40.1
125% 43.7 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 104%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compute Engine Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: Google Compute Engine

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback