Lenovo 20BTS24K04

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemLenovo 20BTS24K04  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20BTS24K04
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20200319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '21 at 16:30
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Memory 44.3
1-Core 24.8
2-Core 41.7
25% 36.9 Pts
4-Core 84.7
8-Core 147
14% 116 Pts
64-Core 262
16% 262 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2227) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4568
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
4.6% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 6.9
4% 4.67 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 8
6% 6.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.6%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U-256G-1006 256GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 175 173 174 172 165 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.9% Poor
Read 27.4
Write 79.8
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 173
21% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 12
4K Mixed 8.1
26% 8.77 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 102
80% 111 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5674-M0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Chip DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32% Below average
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 16.6
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 183
22% 183 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback