Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics45.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-890FXA-UD7  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '17 at 22:30
Run Duration88 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 84.4
1-Core 52.4
2-Core 97
51% 77.9 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 281
29% 234 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.5.2
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.9% Average
Lighting 55.2
Reflection 67.2
Parallax 79.1
45% 67.2 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 54.5
Splatting 55.5
48% 58.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 480GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 878
Write 728
Mixed 845
182% 817 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 35.2
113% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 69.1
70% 114 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 121%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.5% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 12.6
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 9.2
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-890FXA-UD7 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $412
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback