Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics41.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '21 at 15:29
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$124
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 79
1-Core 159
2-Core 319
99% 186 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 862
92% 733 Pts
64-Core 1,066
66% 1,066 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.2% Average
Lighting 53.2
Reflection 56.3
Parallax 45.8
43% 51.8 fps
MRender 40
Gravity 49.3
Splatting 45.3
37% 44.9 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$39
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE500000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 455
Write 264
Mixed 228
69% 316 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 1.4
60% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 98.6
DQ Write 33.5
DQ Mixed 1.4
18% 44.5 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 53%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
258GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 141 142 140 141 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 138
Write 132
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 142
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
228% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL19-19-19 D4-2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,247 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback