Acer Aspire TC-885

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-885  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-885
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180508
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '21 at 22:05
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 699
72% 582 Pts
64-Core 721
45% 721 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.2% Poor
Lighting 34.8
Reflection 40.4
Parallax 42
28% 39.1 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 29.5
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
233GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 124 122 127 103 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 102
Write 105
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 111
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 107%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
242GB free
Firmware: 0502
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 77 78 78 79 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 70
Write 51.3
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 78.3
45% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 66%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
181GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 40 39 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 38
Write 36.5
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 39.3
49% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21%
Great: 21%
SDXC Card 128GB
119GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 43
Write 37.7
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 40.1
50% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 4.1
262% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 Corsair CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.6% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 21.1
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 23.1
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-885 Builds (Compare 1,857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-885

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback