Fujitsu FMVC06001

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu FMVC06001  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB297
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160901
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '21 at 14:14
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 3955U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 79.9
1-Core 63.6
2-Core 114
54% 85.8 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 124
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 510
Fujitsu(10CF 18D2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4574
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
2.55% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 3
2% 2.73 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5.3
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.55%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Am242 PRO-128GB 128GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0722A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 295 322 346 345 145 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.8% Good
Read 458
Write 384
Mixed 314
SusWrite 285
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 16.6
79% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 85.7
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 25.9
68% 136 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
37.9% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 11.1
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 10.9
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback