Emachines ET1862

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Emachines ET1862 (all builds)
Motherboard	eMachines ET1862
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100414
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 22 '21 at 07:42
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 92.8 1-Core 80.1 2-Core 147 66% 107 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 286 39% 289 Pts	64-Core 288 18% 288 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.12.1 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.1% Above average	Lighting 66.7 Reflection 63.1 Parallax 87.6 54% 72.5 fps	MRender 64.2 Gravity 70.1 Splatting 46 48% 60.1 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDT721050SLA360 500GB-$66 2,319 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 252GB free (System drive) Firmware: ST3OA31B SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 63 74 79 88 87 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 96.5 Write 99.8 Mixed 41 SusWrite 73.6 57% 77.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 62%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 139GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 108 109 110 111 111 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Read 119 Write 98.8 Mixed 68.8 SusWrite 109 73% 98.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F 859B CT51264BA160B.C16F 80AD HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 017A 78.B1GDE.AU10C 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.9% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 13.8 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 10 28% 9.67 GB/s	Latency 62.5 64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ET1862 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Emachines ET1862

CPU
Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples	9x
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples	5x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	2x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	2x

SSD
AS340 120GBApacerBench 67%, 5,956 samples	2x
SH103S3240G-NV 240GBKingstonBench 73%, 64 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

RAM
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 0198 99U5471-020.A00LF 0198 ACR128X64D3U1333C9 7GBUnknownBench 26%, 5 samples	2x
HMT425U6AFR6C-PB 1x2GBHynixBench 27%, 179 samples	1x
GU512303EP0202 2x2GBUnknownBench 27%, 1,099 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $110

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16