HP 355 G2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 355 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 22C1
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '21 at 16:48
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-6210 APU R3 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Memory 52.1
1-Core 27.6
2-Core 55
30% 44.9 Pts
4-Core 88.4
8-Core 100
12% 94.4 Pts
64-Core 103
6% 103 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
HP(103C 22C1) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
1.8% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 2.9
2% 2.97 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 3.5
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.8%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK8052GSX 80GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LV010A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 38 46 42 44 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 43.6
Write 50
Mixed 31
SusWrite 43
31% 41.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 34%
Fujitsu MHV2080BH PL 80GB
39GB free
Firmware: 892C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 35.5
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 30.4
24% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Kingston HP16D3LS1KBG/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 6.6
17% 5.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6
15% 5.17 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 355 G2 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 355 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback