Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9450-$110 5,335 User benchmarks, average bench 49% PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Memory 74.9 1-Core 37.7 2-Core 75.2 42% 62.6 Pts	4-Core 143 8-Core 136 19% 140 Pts	64-Core 142 9% 142 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Zotac(19DA 1214) 512MB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.67% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 0.5 2% 1.1 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.67% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 90GB 1,142 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 73 69 71 72 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Read 141 Write 91 Mixed 92.2 SusWrite 71.2 22% 98.9 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 21.9 4K Mixed 21 49% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 27.3 DQ Write 82.8 DQ Mixed 28.6 30% 46.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 5.1 16% 5.73 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 4.6 11% 3.83 GB/s	Latency 90.6 44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	821x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16