Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMar 01 '21 at 14:22
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 95.8
1-Core 140
2-Core 247
92% 161 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 757
74% 604 Pts
64-Core 780
48% 780 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3517 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 158
Parallax 157
131% 159 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 137
Splatting 120
119% 150 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 122%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,192
Write 2,437
Mixed 1,389
447% 2,006 MB/s
4K Read 66.5
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 95.1
320% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,462
DQ Write 1,220
DQ Mixed 1,307
988% 1,330 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
25GB free
Firmware: V8X01c45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 250 43 45 49 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 387
Write 365
Mixed 336
SusWrite 125
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 38.5
142% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 200
155% 209 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 99%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
42GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 427 444 442 442 442 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 421
Mixed 339
SusWrite 427
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 47.4
177% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 170
175% 287 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 115%
Great: 116%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
321GB free
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1478 840 840 836 840 842 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 1,561
Write 1469
Mixed 1,279
SusWrite 946
295% 1,314 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 74.5
275% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,094
DQ Write 1,228
DQ Mixed 1,344
961% 1,222 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 256%
Great: 276%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
51GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 171 171 172 173 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 111
Write 90.9
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 171
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 103%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
468GB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 139 141 140 139 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 161
Write 134
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 139
168% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 41.5
MC Mixed 32.9
109% 38 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 46.3
SC Mixed 32.9
97% 34.1 GB/s
Latency 54.5
73% 54.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $999
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback