MSI A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics36.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7A39
MotherboardMSI A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '21 at 09:28
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 85.1
1-Core 112
2-Core 196
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 443
58% 438 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 1029 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.2.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Lighting 46.7
Reflection 48.6
Parallax 58.4
38% 51.2 fps
MRender 46.3
Gravity 45.1
Splatting 34
33% 41.8 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 08TH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 238 247 248 230 240 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 395
Write 223
Mixed 240
SusWrite 240
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 14.6
95% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 22.8
40% 79.1 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 197 205 201 190 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 140
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 195
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 37
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 39.7
SC Mixed 27.6
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback