Mm-vision Computer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 160%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics160% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMm-vision Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING II
Memory52.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 12 '21 at 19:10
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10980XE-$1,100
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 215
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 817
73% 616 Pts
64-Core 2,538
157% 2,538 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 78%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,104
MSI(1462 3882) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
160% Outstanding
Lighting 194
Reflection 287
Parallax 365
158% 282 fps
MRender 354
Gravity 252
Splatting 183
206% 263 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 160%
Great: 230%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW020T9 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1288 1367 1469 1408 1398 1433 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 1,384
Write 1,458
Mixed 1,066
SusWrite 1,394
299% 1,326 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 59.4
227% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 765
DQ Write 858
DQ Mixed 672
544% 765 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 246%
Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GC3200C16K2E 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 45.2
MC Write 70.8
MC Mixed 44.4
153% 53.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 10.5
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 130%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Computer Builds (Compare 1,703 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

System: Mm-vision Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback