Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '21 at 20:19
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 214
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 521
52% 425 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
Sapphire(174B E305) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.3.1
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Lighting 44.5
Reflection 47.5
Parallax 56.7
36% 49.6 fps
MRender 46.8
Gravity 44
Splatting 33.2
33% 41.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU700 240GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B170428a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 195 199 167 28 165 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.1% Average
Read 204
Write 198
Mixed 186
SusWrite 158
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 20.6
79% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 22.8
DQ Write 76.5
DQ Mixed 22.2
25% 40.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 92%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$54
906GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 140 139 139 141 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 147
Write 149
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 140
82% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-052.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.7% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 9.1
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 1,000 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback