Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B85N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85N  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140709
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 27 '21 at 08:15
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 149
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 410
45% 356 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 2.1
1% 2.57 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 1
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Blaze 120GB-$30
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 73 66 59 89 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 374
Write 101
Mixed 128
SusWrite 73.2
37% 169 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 8.2
37% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 83
DQ Write 67.2
DQ Mixed 6.6
24% 52.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 66%
Samsung 860 EVO mSATA 250GB
100GB free
Firmware: RVT41B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 438 388 273 274 273 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 410
Write 401
Mixed 390
SusWrite 346
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 14.9
4K Mixed 14
47% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.2% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 14.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 16.6
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B85N Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback