Asus P6X58D PREMIUM

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P6X58D PREMIUM (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110510
Uptime	9 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '21 at 20:17
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	36%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5650 13,757 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 90.9 1-Core 73 2-Core 139 63% 101 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 430 43% 351 Pts	64-Core 524 32% 524 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.1% Below average	Lighting 42 Reflection 40.9 Parallax 38.6 34% 40.5 fps	MRender 37.1 Gravity 41.3 Splatting 26.9 28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS480GSSD220S 480GB 5,978 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0624AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 126 106 129 130 128 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.1% Average	Read 249 Write 69 Mixed 107 SusWrite 116 30% 135 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 26 4K Mixed 22.6 72% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 149 111% 147 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 95%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 33GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 193 198 186 205 201 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.9% Average	Read 243 Write 222 Mixed 196 SusWrite 194 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 30.8 4K Mixed 15.4 60% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 179 DQ Write 52 DQ Mixed 50.5 54% 93.9 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 76%
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 5GB free Firmware: 2CV102HD SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 1.5 1.7 50 1.3 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 238 Write 44.2 Mixed 33.9 SusWrite 20.3 18% 84 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 10.8 21% 6.47 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 44%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 33GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 200 197 184 210 175 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60% Good	Read 248 Write 243 Mixed 228 SusWrite 192 51% 228 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 43.6 4K Mixed 30.2 96% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 198 145% 188 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 124%
Hitachi HMS 5C4040ALE640 4TB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1TB free Firmware: MPAO SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 89 92 92 92 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	48.1% Average	Read 75.7 Write 97.7 Mixed 9.7 SusWrite 91.5 49% 68.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 75%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 1,758 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 775GB free, PID 0100 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 106 107 107 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Read 104 Write 105 Mixed 36.6 SusWrite 107 117% 88 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.6% Average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 17 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 9.7 24% 8.53 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6X58D PREMIUM Builds (Compare 680 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 54%

Yacht

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 43%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D PREMIUM

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	134x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	95x
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	70x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	39x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	32x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	32x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $51Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	27x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	19x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $104Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	17x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	140x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	114x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	76x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 104% - Outstanding

Total price: $284

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16