Apple MacBookPro15,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemApple MacBookPro15,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-937A206F2EE63C01
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '21 at 21:32
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 88.2
1-Core 122
2-Core 242
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 604
67% 529 Pts
64-Core 687
42% 687 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 555X
Apple(106B 0190) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 907 MHz, MLim: 1470 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.36.01
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 16.6
10% 18.5 fps
MRender 22.2
Gravity 17.5
Splatting 15
14% 18.2 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP0256 251GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 116.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6252
Write 46.7
Mixed 90.4
442% 2,130 MB/s
4K Read 732
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 5.8
1,119% 247 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 80%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB
298GB free, PID 102a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 41.2
Write 40.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 41.6
53% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.5% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 21.5
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 23
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro15,1 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Apple MacBookPro15,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback