Today's hottest deals

HP p6535a

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p6535a  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '17 at 08:17
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 131
55% 91.9 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 195
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
MSI(1462 2130) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 2.08
Parallax 1.66
1% 1.7 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2
1% 1.59 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$88
610GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3BF Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 119
Write 129
Mixed 109
89% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.31
71% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 74%
WD Elements 1TB
279GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 30
Write 21
Mixed 14.8
26% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.16
54% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 43%
Generic- SD/MMC 16GB
0GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
7.77% Terrible
Read 17.9
Write 6.91
Mixed 8.29
12% 11 MB/s
4K Read 2.83
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.84
72% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.77%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CE80CE80 M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.8% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 12.9
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 7.8
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6535a Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6535a

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback