Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X370-PRO  (all builds)
Memory19 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200728
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 01 '21 at 11:55
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 68.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 211
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 654
64% 523 Pts
64-Core 846
52% 846 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Asus(1043 842A) 1GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 21.3
13% 13.5 fps
MRender 21
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 16
16% 19.4 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
682GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1269 1144 1153 1172 1166 1135 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 2,202
Write 2,152
Mixed 1,566
SusWrite 1,173
398% 1,773 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 60.9
196% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 425
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 424
304% 393 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 238%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
166GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,664
Write 4,825
Mixed 4,891
1,142% 5,127 MB/s
4K Read 402
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 223
989% 267 MB/s
DQ Read 817
DQ Write 620
DQ Mixed 628
494% 688 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Maxtor Z1 SSD 240GB
119GB free
Firmware: STKSF010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 166 162 172 209 170 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.4% Below average
Read 190
Write 104
Mixed 109
SusWrite 185
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 15.6
64% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 25.5
DQ Mixed 18.7
16% 22.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 86%
Toshiba MK8034GSX 79GB
62GB free
Firmware: AH301D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 31 32 31 31 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 32.6
Write 31.1
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 31.1
21% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 18%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$27
401GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 128 129 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 177
Write 167
Mixed 104
SusWrite 128
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion 500GB
466GB free, PID 2320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 79 78 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 73
Write 24.1
Mixed 40
SusWrite 78.6
70% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.7% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 25.1
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 22.7
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $571
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback