Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics39.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory17.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160516
Uptime15.3 Days
Run DateApr 09 '21 at 04:03
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 74
1-Core 51.5
2-Core 102
49% 75.7 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 388
34% 279 Pts
64-Core 407
27% 407 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$450
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.4% Below average
Lighting 40.2
Reflection 46.7
Parallax 39.8
32% 42.2 fps
MRender 43.7
Gravity 61.8
Splatting 45.8
48% 50.4 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 117%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$47
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 137 125 113 135 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 155
Write 180
Mixed 184
SusWrite 122
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 17.5
60% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 89.7
85% 132 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 82%
WDC WDBNCE2500PNC 250GB
199GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 239 231 220 221 221 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 350
Write 276
Mixed 264
SusWrite 230
63% 280 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 23.6
73% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 238
178% 238 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$45
227GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 85 85 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 101
Write 96.5
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 84.5
64% 87 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
43.9% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 17
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 7.2
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 3,489 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $630
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $196Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $50
Intel Core i5-11600K $255Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $217Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $92SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback