Today's hottest deals

Hp-pavilion VT638AA-AC4 600-1110br

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHp-pavilion VT638AA-AC4 600-1110br  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON E66
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 09 '21 at 14:35
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 330
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
40.1% Average
Memory 58.7
1-Core 51.5
2-Core 84.3
41% 64.8 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 116
17% 122 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 230
Device(1B0A 903B) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
2.2% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 1.1
2% 3.1 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.7
2% 3.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.2%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$105
821GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 79 79 41 75 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 74.5
Write 87.1
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 68
52% 71 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9401 SH564128FH8NZPHSCG 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.6% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 10.1
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VT638AA-AC4 600-1110br Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Hp-pavilion VT638AA-AC4 600-1110br

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback