Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 10,197 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	69% Good	Memory 82 1-Core 102 2-Core 161 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 303 8-Core 438 46% 370 Pts	64-Core 464 29% 464 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Lighting 19.4 Reflection 16.2 Parallax 17.6 16% 17.7 fps	MRender 22.7 Gravity 21.5 Splatting 14.9 16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZHPV256HDGL-000H1 256GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW24H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 640 576 579 584 578 498 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 93%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$108 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 138GB free Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 207 82 82 82 85 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Read 455 Write 437 Mixed 382 SusWrite 161 80% 359 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 80.6 4K Mixed 39.7 135% 49.3 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 350 263% 351 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 121%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 475GB 222 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 442GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 75 73 73 76 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 83.7 Write 38.4 Mixed 44.9 SusWrite 73.3 44% 60.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 116%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 1TB 1,714 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 296GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 76 76 76 76 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Read 77.7 Write 56.1 Mixed 49.4 SusWrite 75 85% 64.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB Hynix HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF Hynix HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF M393A1G40DB0-CPB 32GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	MC Read 26.2 MC Write 38.5 MC Mixed 28.4 89% 31 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 19.4 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 76.9 52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 110%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	743x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	376x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	223x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	145x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	130x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	122x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,030 samples	184x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	178x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	158x

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16