Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro16,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics38.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple MacBookPro16,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-E1008331FDC96864
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3072x1920x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '21 at 15:27
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9880H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 82.5
1-Core 121
2-Core 255
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 865
82% 678 Pts
64-Core 1,120
69% 1,120 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
Apple(106B 020F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.36.01
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.6% Below average
Lighting 49.9
Reflection 52.7
Parallax 78
41% 60.2 fps
MRender 42.7
Gravity 55.4
Splatting 32.5
35% 43.5 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 41%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS1 20G2G0A-00JH30 120GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0409
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 64 23 37 11 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 334
Write 80.5
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 36.5
28% 131 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 9.6
38% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 82.6
DQ Write 38.9
DQ Mixed 24.6
28% 48.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 23.1
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 26.5
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro16,1 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Apple MacBookPro16,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback