PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 41.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Mousecomputer ILeDXi-M0B6 (all builds) |
Motherboard | MouseComputer B360M |
Memory | 1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191009 |
Uptime | 2 Days |
Run Date | Apr 19 '21 at 04:57 |
Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
Run User | JPN-User |
Background CPU | 27% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
84.6%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.4%
Average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
ASU800NS38-256GTS-C 256GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 358 315 295 374 381 MB/s
|
81.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5702-089.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.2%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-9700Intel $250Bench 92%, 79,875 samples | 5x |
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 2x |
Core i5-8400Intel $120Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples | 3x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 2x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $760 |