Supox B250A-BTC PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemSupox B250A-BTC PRO  (all builds)
MotherboardSUPoX B250A-BTC PRO
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '21 at 23:04
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 71.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 206
71% 127 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 286
38% 287 Pts
64-Core 282
17% 282 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2402 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54% Above average
Lighting 65.5
Reflection 68.9
Parallax 64.3
53% 66.2 fps
MRender 79.9
Gravity 64.1
Splatting 61.1
55% 68.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingbank KP330 60GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 38 79 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 436
Write 180
Mixed 240
SusWrite 46.6
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 11.3
97% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 50.2
DQ Mixed 16.1
28% 56.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 51%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
551GB free
Firmware: AX1G1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 101 104 102 98 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 79.8
Write 91.4
Mixed 31
SusWrite 99.9
55% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.1% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 10.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback