Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160119
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 23 '21 at 07:59
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 840 Quad Core
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Memory 47.6
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 108
42% 71.9 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 165
19% 146 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$75
CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.2
Reflection 27.9
Parallax 30.8
16% 26.3 fps
MRender 27.5
Gravity 24
Splatting 24.9
21% 25.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200828
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 15 79 87 99 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 358
Write 22.1
Mixed 47
SusWrite 55.2
26% 121 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 2.6
36% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 4.5
DQ Mixed 3.3
6% 11.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 166%
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
108GB free
Firmware: V8X02c08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 261 262 264 266 270 MB/s
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.3% Above average
Read 174
Write 240
Mixed 193
SusWrite 263
49% 217 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 23.9
82% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 22.3
DQ Write 53.1
DQ Mixed 29.7
25% 35 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 88%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
375GB free
Firmware: AM0P1D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 24 101 101 102 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 68.7
Write 88.1
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 65.9
46% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 60%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 64GB
60GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 22.4
Write 12.7
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 12.8
17% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.9
129% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
35.6% Below average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 15.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.9
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-H Builds (Compare 378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback