QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 28 '21 at 21:34
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 82.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 252
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 1,000
89% 752 Pts
64-Core 1000
62% 1000 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
CLim: 1622 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.3% Very good
Lighting 97.9
Reflection 105
Parallax 149
80% 117 fps
MRender 88.6
Gravity 106
Splatting 75.8
72% 90.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 480GB
121GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 242 236 243 225 237 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
66% Good
Read 453
Write 339
Mixed 198
SusWrite 243
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 22.8
78% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 114
109% 172 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 66%
Great: 74%
Red Hat VirtIO 107GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 467
Write 415
Mixed 385
317% 422 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 35.5
6,128% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 182
1,708% 190 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 82%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
944GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 221 222 226 227 226 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 239
Write 228
Mixed 128
SusWrite 225
150% 205 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 1.6
445% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 134%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
150% Outstanding
MC Read 83.4
MC Write 46.5
MC Mixed 45
167% 58.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.6
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 37.6
86% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 150%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback