Pegatron H36Y

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemPegatron H36Y  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON H36Y
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101102
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateApr 29 '21 at 09:20
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Memory 53.9
1-Core 59.5
2-Core 106
44% 73.1 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 112
16% 115 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Device(1B0A 2041) 1.5GB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2993
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK4058GSX 400GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FF01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 38 38 41 41 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 34.5
Write 35.2
Mixed 22
SusWrite 40.1
24% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 35%
ST2000VX 003-1HH164 2TB
2TB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 21 21 21 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.9% Very poor
Read 24.7
Write 21.2
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 21.6
29% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5773CHS-CH9 80CE M471B5673EH1-CF8 4GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 7.9
19% 6.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H36Y Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Pegatron H36Y

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback