Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H97-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory18.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '21 at 09:00
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 125
2-Core 238
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 549
54% 443 Pts
64-Core 601
37% 601 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85FF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.4% Poor
Lighting 34.7
Reflection 38
Parallax 35.9
28% 36.2 fps
MRender 35.2
Gravity 35.8
Splatting 25.4
26% 32.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 164 91 86 86 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 413
Mixed 335
SusWrite 134
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 98.3
4K Mixed 50.1
180% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 230
207% 314 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$53
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 183 183 182 183 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 149
Mixed 79
SusWrite 181
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 108%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$82
56GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 94 90 93 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 90.9
Write 61.5
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 91.8
56% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 114%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB
938GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 142 104 147 145 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 156
Write 144
Mixed 117
SusWrite 138
103% 139 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 0.7
416% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 102%
WDC WD15 EACS-11BHUB0 1.5TB
710GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 46 46 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 92.9
Write 92.9
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 45.7
94% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 34%
WDC WD20 PURZ-85GU6Y0 2TB
49GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 46 46 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 110
Write 108
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 45.8
99% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 39%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
2GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 76.7
Write 79.3
Mixed 58.3
91% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 0420 F3-1600C9-8GXM KHX1600C10D3/4G 0420 F3-1600C9-8GXM 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H97-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $415
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback