Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 10 '21 at 17:31
Run Duration	85 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10600T 3 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56.7% Above average	Memory 50.9 1-Core 112 2-Core 205 66% 123 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 425 50% 386 Pts	64-Core 466 29% 466 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 871C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.27 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.2% Below average	Lighting 39.1 Reflection 35.4 Parallax 34.2 32% 36.2 fps	MRender 30.8 Gravity 35.7 Splatting 32.7 27% 33.1 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 46%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 129GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,962 Write 1,737 Mixed 1,687 400% 1,796 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 38.8 4K Mixed 36.9 125% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 578 DQ Write 480 DQ Mixed 522 393% 526 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x8GB 5,342 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 10.3 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 7.1 21% 7.3 GB/s	Latency 158 25% 158 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 145%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $350