Today's hottest deals

Intel WilsonCity

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel WilsonCity  (all builds)
Memory123.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '21 at 07:11
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000%@
CPU0, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.5% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 81.7
2-Core 164
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 632
55% 471 Pts
64-Core 4,135
256% 4,135 Pts
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
AMD(1002 0B0D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1086 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 19
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 30.3
16% 30 fps
MRender 40
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 29
24% 30.1 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BB012T7 1TB
540GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N2010018
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 315 317 316 313 311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 165
Write 289
Mixed 213
SusWrite 315
56% 246 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 13.6
67% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 192
151% 212 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 77%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
24GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 12 14 18 6.2 18 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 72.1
Write 33.8
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 12.9
32% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.5
108% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF2G72PDZ-3G2E1 8x16GB
8 of 32 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
273% Outstanding
MC Read 109
MC Write 129
MC Mixed 110
331% 116 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 12.8
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 273%
Great: 273%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback