Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookAir9,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics46.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple MacBookAir9,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-0CFF9C7C2B63DF8D
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '21 at 17:52
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1030NG7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Memory 44.9
1-Core 56.1
2-Core 74.9
36% 58.6 Pts
4-Core 119
8-Core 160
18% 140 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.1% Average
Lighting 57.8
Reflection 58
Parallax 54.9
47% 56.9 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 53.1
Splatting 47.5
44% 54.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP0512 500GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1160
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1071 939 704 786 818 807 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9HCNNNCRMALPR-NEE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 16.5
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 13.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookAir9,1 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookAir9,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback