Asus G10AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G10AC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G10AC
Memory18.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '21 at 22:32
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 182
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 476
47% 384 Pts
64-Core 468
29% 468 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 (192-bit)
Asus(1043 8477) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 22.7
Parallax 28.4
16% 23.7 fps
MRender 24.4
Gravity 24.8
Splatting 21.9
19% 23.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 125 132 114 112 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 406
Write 122
Mixed 247
SusWrite 118
49% 223 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 35.7
124% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 151
147% 238 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 116%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
131GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 18 19 18 32 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
931GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 215 221 218 227 222 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 437
Write 420
Mixed 368
SusWrite 228
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 23.5
126% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 358
267% 355 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
628GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 16 15 17 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 107%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 1TB
1TB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 5.3 3 5.8 6 4.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
4.41% Terrible
Read 14.7
Write 4.7
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 4.7
10% 8.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.41%
Great: 7%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 537GB
399GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.9 3.3 5.9 6 5.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
4.93% Terrible
Read 16.7
Write 18.9
Mixed 12
SusWrite 5
17% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
26% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.93%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLB304G08-GGNHM 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.1% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 15
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.3
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G10AC Builds (Compare 365 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus G10AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $75
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback